Long Tail Fans

 Long Tail Fans

A few years ago, Chris Anderson from Wired wrote an influential book called The Long TailOwen Kelly, from the The Indie Digest, put together this great chart showing the Long Tail concept and how it applies to your fans.  I’m a sucker for cool graphics, especially ones that use typography in a fun way. My favorite part of this is how he uses each section to describe the fans and where they are in relation to you.  The goal is to move everyone into the far left column, true fans.  Unfortunately, this is more difficult than ever.

Chris Anderson recently released a book called Free, which explains how “free” works as an economic model.  I’m still working my way through it on my iPhone version.  I recently read a blog post on Union Square Ventures that stated value comes from scarcity.  When information was scarce, it was more valuable.  One example: encyclopedias used contain vast amounts of expert-based knowledge and were expensive, but Wikipedia allowed anyone to share their expertise and knowledge and everyone gets it all for free.  So information is no longer scarce and, while still useful, it’s not as valuable.  What is and always has been scarce is attention.  We only have 24 hours in a day, so our attention is more precious and valuable than ever, which is what advertisers have always known and constantly vying for with an ever-increasing amount of annoyance.

Our challenge as artists is to make what we do valuable enough for people to spend some of their precious attention on us.  The keys are truly simple: make good music, play it extremely well live, and connect with fans.

RIP Les Paul

Les Paul, the inventor of multi-track recording, the Les Paul guitar, and the tape delay, not even to mention his amazing guitar playing and Hall of Fame-worthy music with Mary Ford, passed yesterday from complications with pneumonia.  I had hopes of seeing his show in New York before he passed, but I it looks like God had other plans.

eMusic to sue if iTunes goes buffet

eMusic says they will sue Apple if they decide to try buffet-style access with the purchase of a premium-priced device.  One of the options Apple could offer in the future would be this: if you buy their premium device (like an iPhone with a crazy add-on fee), you get all the music you want from the iTunes store.  Sounds good for the consumer, right?

According to eMusic, this would be the definition of tying, that is, ” the practice of making the sale of one good (the tying good) to the de facto or de jure customer conditional on the purchase of a second distinctive good (the tied good)” (Wikipedia).  This is from the Sherman Anti-trust law, enacted in 1890, which says, “Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony”.

To sum up, if someone buys an iPod, they are tied to major label content (potentially shutting out independent sources of entertainment).  Which would be tying to a tee.  As much as I would love to have the buffet-style access to iTunes, it would be not be in the best interest of EVERYONE if this were allowed.  Indie artists like myself get screwed (once again by major labels), because the largest music market (iPod owners) would be almost unattainable to reach.

The only hole I see in this case is: would iPods/iTouches/iPhone be prevented from loading music from other sources (like CDs or other distributors)?  If so, this would clearly be tying and would not be allowed to continue, by law.  If Apple retains their current policies of allowing any MP3 or AAC to be played on their players, then this suit could have issues, but should still be brought, if anything just to bring all the details to light.